Voting for steroid users

Fans of baseball and many other persons seem to be perturbed by results of voting for the Hall of Fame. Several great players have not been elected for the Baseball Hall of Fame. It is quite naturally that you also ask why they have not been elected. Under guidelines of voting, those that have displayed amazing baseball abilities and contributed to their teams obviously should be elected. Undoubtedly, such baseball players, as Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Sammy Sosa, Rafael Palmeiro, Mark McGwire and some other sportspersons have manifested splendid abilities and achievements while playing professionally. Why aren’t they in the Baseball Hall of Fame?
A lot of voters state that they will never support those that have ever been linked to anabolic steroids and/or other related medicines. Dopers must be sanctioned. Future generations should realize that they will never actually succeed, if they take doping products.
What would you do, if you were a member of the Baseball Writers’ Association of America? Would you support consumers of steroids?
In fact, voters never possess complete information about admitted and suspected dopers. You can’t prove that Roger Clemens has really administered performance-enhancing drugs. A lot of persons have suspicions but there is no any proof. How may voters refuse to support him? Are they sure that he has used anabolic steroids and other forbidden drugs? –No, they aren’t. That’s why it is unfair to keep Roger Clemens out of the Baseball Hall of Fame just because of suspicions.
While some voters are ready to support suspected consumers of steroids, they claim that they will never vote for an admitted steroid user. However it seems to be right, let review the situation better! Have steroids played any essential role in success of certain baseball player? For example, if even Roger Clemens has taken doping products, it is possible to convince anyone that he has had great success not because of steroid use. Great accomplishment of this well-known baseball player have been shown before his alleged usage of steroids. According to some statements, Roger Clemens has administered steroids since 1998 and then in 2000 and 2001.  But the most brilliant achievements have been done by him before 1998. Thus, no one can claim that anabolic steroids have helped Roger Clemens to have such great success. That’s why he should be in the Hall of Fame.
Moreover, why are many individuals inclined to demonize only steroid users? Isn’t it the society that presses sportspeople to start taking anabolic steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs?