Roger Clemens jurors: there was nothing to be pursued

Names of twelve persons (4 men and 8 women) who acted as jury at the governmental case against Roger Clemens were released by the judge Reggie Walton.
The government desired the jury to be convinced that the athlete had lied before the Congress about intake of steroids and HGH. But since the jury acquitted Roger Clemens, the government criticized the individuals who served as the jury. Certain individuals who served as the jury were interviewed.
A political activist, an art historian, a teacher of deaf kids, an official of Treasury Department and an employee of the Canadian Embassy were included in the jury.
The political activist Joyce Robinson-Paul was interviewed by the New York Daily News several days after the verdict. She noted that the jurors knew that they had to be fair to both the federal prosecutors and the baseball player. But they didn’t find anything that had to be prosecuted.  Later she also noted that the federal prosecutors were not capable to prove their affirmations.
Bradford Weaver, an employee of the Canadian Embassy stated that the government was wrong. He noticed that such situations should not happen again. This person also confirmed that there was nothing to be prosecuted. He was interviewed by the Associated Press. Bradford Weaver also affirmed that every juror was convinced from the very beginning that Roger Clemens was not guilty of any charge. This person reminded that each juror was unanimous.
The employee of the Canadian Embassy was also asked whether he thought that Roger Clemens really used steroids. The Associated Press also asked him whether he considered that the governmental case against the athlete represented only the waste of taxpayers’ funds. But Bradford Weaver refused to answer the questions.
Another juror that preferred not to be named claimed that the jurors didn’t understand how the government made the decision to waste large sums of money during five years in order to prosecute the baseball player. This person noted that it was impossible to understand why the prosecution lasted for 5 years.
Other jurors didn’t provide any information.
As for feds, they seemed to be completely disappointed. They declined to respond to the affirmations presented by the jurors.